|
|
Post by Fallindown on Dec 6, 2007 22:05:46 GMT -5
Grace Carlson. I didn't have to look that up, bitch.
|
|
|
|
Post by DY no MITE on Dec 6, 2007 22:10:22 GMT -5
Somers is 32 so we had aging he'd probably be his forties now lmao
|
|
|
|
Post by Stonedog on Dec 6, 2007 22:13:41 GMT -5
Ok, I think some ppl may be missing my point. The concept of this idea WAS to add fun to the league. Look, we are about to have IMMAF 78, right? Well, in my timeline, that means IMMAF has ben open for 5 1/2 years. So, no one would be retiring soon unless they started their fighter at age 40 or 39. In other words, if you created a fighter who was 25 years old and he was on IMMAF 1, he would have to go 20 years before he had to retire and that would put him at IMMAF 240. All I am saying is that if we did retire some of the older guys, then we could have more fun creating new ones. It could also serve with tracking who belongs in the Hall of Fame.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fallindown on Dec 6, 2007 22:22:20 GMT -5
We don't need to be forced to get rid of old guys. The IMMAF doesn't have that problem; we have the adoption system if you're sick of an old fighter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tystick357 on Dec 6, 2007 22:51:51 GMT -5
Or people can just retire them on there own.
Also IMMAF would be longer than "5 years", especially the first 10 to 20 shows. We didn't run them weekly for a long time.
IMMAF Started about August 20, 2005. Now it is December 2007.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tystick357 on Dec 6, 2007 22:54:13 GMT -5
The way I would timeline it would be like.
IMMAF 1
3 months
IMMAF 2
3 months
IMMAF 3
3 months
IMMAF 4
3 months
IMMAF 5
3 months
IMMAF 6
2 months
IMMAF 7
2 months
IMMAF 8
3 months
IMMAF 9
3 months
IMMAF 9
6 months
IMMAF 10
Then from there I'd have to look back again, that's a rough estimate though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tystick357 on Dec 6, 2007 22:55:22 GMT -5
Maybe even longer in between those
|
|
|
|
Post by DY no MITE on Dec 7, 2007 0:58:48 GMT -5
I think Somers debuted on IMMAF 29
|
|
|
|
Post by Stonedog on Dec 7, 2007 1:00:24 GMT -5
That's cool too, Ty. I am just saying Bayan Bayar, Tobius Irvin, and some others shouldn't be fighting at IMMAF XXX. I like the idea that fighters grow older. They grow in their MMA skills, so why shouldn't they grow in their age. A person can't fight forever.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stonedog on Dec 7, 2007 1:01:06 GMT -5
Besides, this was just an idea. I was just spitballing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tystick357 on Dec 7, 2007 1:04:58 GMT -5
If you read in the first page, I want ideas from you guys.
I think Irvin joined rather young, 22 or 24 maybe.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tystick357 on Dec 7, 2007 1:09:02 GMT -5
Okay he joined at age 26.
IMMAF might be 14 years if you figure it all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stonedog on Dec 7, 2007 1:20:10 GMT -5
See, Irvin is nearing retirement. Then he'd be eligible for the Hall of Fame. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Tystick357 on Dec 7, 2007 1:25:02 GMT -5
Only because I brought him back to win the FW belt, other than that he never had any "accomplishements" besides being in the finale of the first WW GP and absolutely destroying Chris Whiteford in his prime.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tystick357 on Dec 7, 2007 1:25:36 GMT -5
Oh well can't forget the first standing RNC, especially since he was fighting a HW.
|
|
